Google’s Mueller on Myth of Hidden Tab Content

Google’s Mueller on Myth of Hidden Tab Content
‘ );

h3_html = ‘



cta = ‘‘+cat_head_params.cta_text.textual content+’
atext = ‘


scdetails = scheader.getElementsByClassName( ‘scdetails’ );
sappendHtml( scdetails[0], h3_html );
sappendHtml( scdetails[0], atext );
sappendHtml( scdetails[0], cta );
// brand
sappendHtml( scheader, “” );
sc_logo = scheader.getElementsByClassName( ‘sc-logo’ );
logo_html = ‘‘;
sappendHtml( sc_logo[0], logo_html );

sappendHtml( scheader, ‘


‘ );

if(“undefined”!=typeof __gaTracker)
} // endif cat_head_params.sponsor_logo

In a Google Office Hours hangout Google’s John Mueller corrected a lingering misperception about content material hidden behind tags and accordions. Specifically, he busted the parable that Google weights or values content material that’s hidden behind accordions and tabs.

Google Values Hidden Content Less?

There’s a well-liked concept that Google treats content material that’s not instantly seen as much less vital. But that notion is just not supported by official statements from Google.

In 2013 Matt Cutts mentioned in a video to not fear about textual content hidden behind a “see content” kind of button.

And in 2016 Gary Illyes affirmed that content material hidden behind accordions are given full weight.

Some time between these two dates some within the search engine marketing group reached a special conclusion.

I’ve at all times ignored sure folks within the search group as a result of a lot of what mentioned was clickbait nonsense primarily based on unreliable correlation research.

But the concept Google provides much less weight to content material behind tabs and accordions took root amongst these clickbait SEOs and a few of their unsupported concepts proceed to linger in the present day.

I received’t put up a hyperlink to articles I noticed revealed in 2017 that contradict Gary’s feedback from 2016. But I’ll be aware that each reference to Google confirming that they provide much less weight to JavaScript/CSS hidden content material is just not accompanied by a hyperlink, not accompanied by a particular quote and never accompanied by even a reputation of what Googler mentioned what they declare that Google mentioned.

Any statements missing attribution can’t be trusted. 

I looked for official affirmation however couldn’t discover any references to an official Google publication the place Google tells builders to not use jQuery accordions.

So it looks like the worry of jQuery hidden content material tabs and accordions could have originated in some bizarre recreation of phone between sure SEOs, stitched collectively from oblique feedback John Mueller had mentioned.

Here’s the query:

“In the mobile first indexing world, will the. hidden text, hidden content behind tabs and accordions still be devalued, for example because there’s a lower chance that it will be seen by a user?”

Mueller answered with an unambiguous no.

Here’s Mueller easy reply:


Specifically in relation to content material on cellular pages we do bear in mind something that’s within the HTML.

So if there’s one thing there that could be seen to customers in some unspecified time in the future we are going to embody that… in order that’s utterly regular.”

If It’s Visible in HTML

If you take a look at the code for lots of these tabs and accordions, the content material is true there.

What John Mueller says is sensible within the context of if the code is there within the  HTML then Google can see it. If I can see it within the code, absolutely Google can, too.

If the content material is loaded within the HTML however merely hidden with CSS, Google can nonetheless see it.

Watch the Hangout Here

More Resources

Source hyperlink search engine marketing

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.